OLAC Record oai:scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu:10125/42024

Metadata
Title:		Giving back to the language community: lessons from the Kiowa and Ojibwe peoples
Bibliographic Citation:		Miller, Taylor, Miller, Taylor; 2017-03-04; In this paper, I discuss two very different language communities: the Kiowa tribe in southwestern Oklahoma and the Saulteaux Ojibwe first nation in Manitoba. Kiowa is a critically endangered language with only 10 native speakers, all nearing the age of 90. Revitalization efforts have been intermittent over the last 40 years, and little has helped. Saulteaux Ojibwe, while also endangered, is much healthier with 10,000 native speakers, some of whom are teachers with linguistic training actively conducting their own research. Drawing from my experience, I show that these marked differences lead to distinct needs and thus different directions for researchers to give back to the communities. I detail two general approaches that any linguist should be able to adopt in similar communities. The Kiowa tribe has little access to audio recordings of their language because the recordings were not digitized and/or copies were never provided. They have not seen a number of the resulting papers and books from previous researchers, and the only comprehensive dictionary is from the 1920s. In the words of one of my consultants: “If there was a dictionary with the sounds, too, I could die. I’m one of the last ones who knows how you’re supposed to pronounce things, and it will be lost forever without something like that.” While it is true that not everyone is equipped to commit to a full dictionary project, by doing research as we would anyway we can still make a big impact. Namely, a linguist can amass the available data in preparing their own research (search for previous recordings, contact other scholars, scan articles and books) and also be sure to give copies of those materials directly to the community (e.g. a museum, library, or community center). There are already online dictionaries and educational applications for the many dialects of Ojibwe, making research and data more readily available to the community and interested researchers. Thus, the community requires a markedly different approach than that of the Kiowa tribe. Namely, the Saulteaux Ojibwe community’s language teachers and researchers, working on the front lines of language revitalization, are seeking validation and support. In the spirit of more collaborative fieldwork (e.g., Mannix et al. 2015, Brooke Lillehaugen p.c.), we should look to work with the native community in the production and dissemination of the research (e.g. co-authoring papers, presentations, and grants), bringing our skills (and data) to the table of ongoing projects.; Kaipuleohone University of Hawai'i Digital Language Archive;http://hdl.handle.net/10125/42024.
Contributor (speaker):		Miller, Taylor
Creator:		Miller, Taylor
Date (W3CDTF):		2017-03-04
Description:		In this paper, I discuss two very different language communities: the Kiowa tribe in southwestern Oklahoma and the Saulteaux Ojibwe first nation in Manitoba. Kiowa is a critically endangered language with only 10 native speakers, all nearing the age of 90. Revitalization efforts have been intermittent over the last 40 years, and little has helped. Saulteaux Ojibwe, while also endangered, is much healthier with 10,000 native speakers, some of whom are teachers with linguistic training actively conducting their own research. Drawing from my experience, I show that these marked differences lead to distinct needs and thus different directions for researchers to give back to the communities. I detail two general approaches that any linguist should be able to adopt in similar communities. The Kiowa tribe has little access to audio recordings of their language because the recordings were not digitized and/or copies were never provided. They have not seen a number of the resulting papers and books from previous researchers, and the only comprehensive dictionary is from the 1920s. In the words of one of my consultants: “If there was a dictionary with the sounds, too, I could die. I’m one of the last ones who knows how you’re supposed to pronounce things, and it will be lost forever without something like that.” While it is true that not everyone is equipped to commit to a full dictionary project, by doing research as we would anyway we can still make a big impact. Namely, a linguist can amass the available data in preparing their own research (search for previous recordings, contact other scholars, scan articles and books) and also be sure to give copies of those materials directly to the community (e.g. a museum, library, or community center). There are already online dictionaries and educational applications for the many dialects of Ojibwe, making research and data more readily available to the community and interested researchers. Thus, the community requires a markedly different approach than that of the Kiowa tribe. Namely, the Saulteaux Ojibwe community’s language teachers and researchers, working on the front lines of language revitalization, are seeking validation and support. In the spirit of more collaborative fieldwork (e.g., Mannix et al. 2015, Brooke Lillehaugen p.c.), we should look to work with the native community in the production and dissemination of the research (e.g. co-authoring papers, presentations, and grants), bringing our skills (and data) to the table of ongoing projects.
Identifier (URI):		http://hdl.handle.net/10125/42024
Table Of Contents:		42024.pdf
		42024.mp3
Type (DCMI):		Text
		Sound
OLAC Info
Archive:		Language Documentation and Conservation
Description:		http://www.language-archives.org/archive/ldc.scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu
GetRecord:		OAI-PMH request for OLAC format
GetRecord:		Pre-generated XML file
OAI Info
OaiIdentifier:		oai:scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu:10125/42024
DateStamp:		2017-05-11
GetRecord:		OAI-PMH request for simple DC format
Search Info
Citation:		Miller, Taylor. 2017. Language Documentation and Conservation.
Terms:		dcmi_Sound dcmi_Text